The community desires to be instructed (simple as that); in seminary they do not school a belief on written material as a whole, or its relative amount to any some other piece. Often the teachers balance this argument undistinguished at best, not pure. There are written material masterworks out there, but best of them are not what we reflect on they are. Hemingway, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, Joyce ( 'Ulysses' his tour de force is goose egg but a foolish Picasso), as was Gertrude Stein's work, no have what I titled masterwork interlacing in them, yes interesting, but far from admitted into the superior category, noticeably outclassed to the Odyssey. Apologies for selecting these readers, I have peak of their works, read all of them, and clear-cut as they are, they are impoverished versions for a Nobel Price in Literature, or any return in written material which is say to be top shelf pack.
Neither Faulkner nor Hemingway went to body and one can archer that in their writings, filled of repetitiveness. If that is what they are schooling in academy next literature is constrained to be hard-pressed excursion and secured up in an old chest, for something other. The close at hand past has miscalculations, roughness in their beat out selections of junk; Emersion, was within your rights when he aforementioned Nathanial Hawthorn was unlearned, and unprofessional, and lazy in his writings, and that is when North America started selecting, second fastest to be best, and now we are down to 5th finest is cream of the crop. E.E. Cummings, next to his hollow actuality of poetry, has a few I like, out of an uncountable number, and Ezra Pound, a grave intellectual of his day in literature, probably came adpressed to what could have been...but ne'er was.